↓ Skip to Main Content
Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • Contact Us
  • People
  • Partners
    • Research Partners
    • Institutional Partners
  • Projects
    • Comparative Analysis of the Impacts of Delivery Restrictions in Large Cities
    • Analyses of Freight Patterns in Medellin, Colombia
    • Freight Generation Study for Manufacturing Districts in Bogota, Colombia
    • Final Report: Impact of Policy Induced Modal-Shifts
  • News
  • Workshops
    • NYC Freight Workshop
  • Peer-to-Peer Exchange Program
  • Software and Tools
Home › Private: Improving Freight System Performance in Metropolitan Areas: Planning Guide › Section 3

Section 3

Case Studies

Overview
Atlanta, GA
Kansas City, MO
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
Seattle, WA
Toledo, OH

Previous   Home      Next    

3958 Total Views 1 Views Today
  • Introduction
  • Urban Freight Transportation Decision Making
    • Overview
    • Definition of Freight Issue
    • Root Causes
    • Goals and Objectives
    • Performance Measures
    • Potential Initiatives
    • Analysis of Alternatives
    • Preferred Alternatives
    • Action Plan
    • Pilot Test
    • Followup
  • Public Sector Initiatives
    • Overview
    • Infrastructure Management
      • Initiative 1: Ring Roads for Bypass Traffic
      • Initiative 2a: New and Upgraded Infrastructure, Intermodal Terminals
      • Initiative 2b: New and Upgraded Infrastructure, Intermodal Terminals
      • Initiative 2c: New and Upgraded Infrastructure, Intermodal Terminals
      • Initiative 2d: New and Upgraded Infrastructure, Intermodal Terminals
      • Initiative 3: Freight Cluster Development (Freight Village)
      • Initiative 4: Acceleration/Deceleration Lanes
      • Initiative 5: Removal of Geometric Constraints at Intersections
      • Initiative 6: Ramps for Handcarts and Forklifts
      • Planning and Design Considerations
    • Parking/Loading Areas Management
      • Initiative 7: Freight Parking and Loading Zones: Location, Number, and Size
      • Initiative 8: Loading and Parking Restrictions
      • Initiative 9: Peak Hour Clearways
      • Initiative 10: Vehicle Parking Reservation Systems
      • Initiative 11: Enhanced Building Codes
      • Initiative 12: Timesharing of Parking Spaces
      • Initiative 13: Upgrade Parking Areas and Loading Docks
      • Initiative 14: Improved Staging Areas
      • Initiative 15: Truck Stops/Parking Outside of Metropolitan Areas
      • Planning and Design Considerations
    • Vehicle Related Strategies
      • Initiative 16: Emission Standards
      • Initiative 17: Low-Noise Delivery Programs/Regulations
      • Planning and Design Considerations
    • Traffic Management
      • Initiative 18: Vehicle Size and Weight Restrictions
      • Initiative 19: Truck Routes
      • Initiative 20: Engine-Related Restrictions
      • Initiative 21: Low Emission Zones
      • Initiative 22: Load Factor Restrictions
      • Initiative 23-25: Time Access Restrictions
      • Initiative 26: Restricted Multi-Use Lanes
      • Initiative 27: Exclusive Truck Lanes
      • Initiative 28: Traffic Control
      • Planning and Design Considerations
    • Pricing, Incentives, and Taxation
      • Initiative 29: Road Pricing /Incentives
      • Initiative 30: Parking Pricing
      • Initiative 31-33: Certification/Recognition Programs/Incentives
      • Initiative 34: Taxation
      • Planning and Design Considerations
    • Logistical Management
      • Initiative 35: Urban Consolidation Centers
      • Initiative 36: Real-Time Information Systems
      • Initiative 37: Vertical Height Detection Systems
      • Initiative 38: Dynamic Routing
      • Initiative 39: Time Slotting of Deliveries for Large Traffic Generators
      • Initiative 40: Driver Training Programs
      • Initiative 41: Anti-Idling Programs
      • Initiative 42: Pick-up/Delivery to Alternate Destinations
      • Planning and Design Considerations
    • Freight Demand/Land Use Management
      • Initiative 43: Voluntary Off-Hour Deliveries Program
      • Initiative 44: Staggered Work Hours Program
      • Initiative 45: Receiver-Led Delivery Consolidation Program
      • Initiative 46: Mode Shift Program
      • Initiative 47: Relocation of Large Traffic Generators
      • Initiative 48: Integrating Freight into Land Use Planning Process
      • Planning and Design Considerations
    • Stakeholder Engagement
      • Initiative 49: Designate a Freight-Person at Key Agencies
      • Initiative 50: Create a Freight Advisory Committee (FAC)
      • Initiative 51: Educate Elected Officials
      • Initiative 52: Create a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
      • Initiative 53: Create a Freight Quality Partnership (FQP)
      • Initiative 54: Foster an Industry-Led Best Practices Dissemination Program
  • Case Studies
    • Overview
    • Atlanta, GA
      • Introduction
      • Case Study 1: 1996 Olympic Games Delivery Experiment
      • Case Study 2: Regional Truck Routing
    • Kansas City, MO
      • Introduction
      • Case Study 3: Freight Rail Bottlenecks
    • Los Angeles, CA
      • Introduction
      • Case Study 4: Corridor Development
    • New York, NY
      • Introduction
      • Case Study 5: Church Avenue Project Corridor, Brooklyn, NY
      • Case Study 6: Columbus Avenue, First and Second Avenues, Manhattan, NY
      • Case Study 7: Maspeth Truck Route Re-designation, Maspeth, NY
    • Seattle, WA
      • Introduction
      • Case Study 8: Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor
    • Toledo, OH
      • Introduction
      • Case Study 9: Airline Junction Yard
  • References
  • Appendix
    • Freight Trip Generation (FTG) Software
    • Initial Data Collection Assessment
    • Initiative Selector
    • Evaluation Matrices for Public Sector Initiatives
  • Download FTG Software

    Funded by

    NATIONAL COOPERATIVE FREIGHT RESEARCH PROGRAM

    Prime Contractor

    Partners

    © 2023 Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems